Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Trusted trial lawyers aggressively
fighting for justice for our clients.
Request free consultation
Charleston Injury Lawyers / Blog / Truck Accidents / When the Truck Driver Walks Away Unhurt: What a Fatal I-95 Crash Says About Fault

When the Truck Driver Walks Away Unhurt: What a Fatal I-95 Crash Says About Fault

Trucker

Three people are dead after a crash on I-95 in Dorchester County, and the driver of the tractor trailer involved did not suffer a single injury. That contrast is jarring, but it is also common in truck crash litigation, and it raises a question that matters far beyond this one case: how do you determine fault when one vehicle is built to survive a collision and the other is not?

The Crash Near Mile Marker 83

According to the South Carolina Highway Patrol, the collision happened on September 11 at around 1:09 p.m. near mile marker 83 on I-95 northbound. Both vehicles were traveling north when a Honda SUV struck the tractor trailer. Three occupants of the SUV died, and three others, including the driver, were taken to a hospital. The truck driver was not hurt. The crash remains under investigation.

Why the Physics Don’t Decide the Legal Outcome

It is tempting to assume that because the SUV struck the truck, the SUV driver was automatically at fault. Investigators and insurance companies rarely stop there, especially when the damages are this severe. A rear or side impact between a passenger vehicle and an eighty-thousand-pound commercial vehicle can happen for reasons that have nothing to do with the smaller car simply following too closely. Sudden braking, an improper lane change, a trailer that swung wide, or a driver who exceeded the hours allowed under federal law can all shift the picture.

Commercial drivers are bound by the hours of service limits found in 49 C.F.R. § 395.3, which cap driving time and require rest breaks specifically because fatigue slows reaction time and increases the odds of a crash. Attorneys investigating a case like this one typically look at several sources of evidence before drawing conclusions, including:

  • Electronic logging device and hours of service records
  • The truck’s event data recorder, sometimes called a black box
  • Dashcam or nearby traffic camera footage
  • Maintenance and inspection logs for the tractor and trailer
  • Toxicology results and post-crash statements from both drivers
  • Weather, lighting, and roadway conditions at the time of impact

What Happens If Fault Is Shared

South Carolina follows a modified comparative negligence rule under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-38-15. A person who is found less than fifty percent at fault can still recover damages, though the award is reduced by their share of responsibility. Cross the fifty percent line and recovery is barred entirely. This is one reason early, independent investigation matters so much in truck crash cases. The trucking company and its insurer will conduct their own review, and that review is not designed to protect the families of the people who died.

It is also worth noting that a wrongful death claim in South Carolina is not limited to the driver of the other vehicle. Depending on what the investigation shows, a trucking company can be held responsible for its own negligence in hiring, training, or scheduling a driver, separate from anything the driver did personally behind the wheel.

Can a Charleston Truck Accident Attorney Help After a Crash Like This?

Losing three family members in a single crash is the kind of loss that no settlement can undo, but it can still relieve the financial burden that follows, from funeral costs to lost future income. If your family is facing a similar situation, we encourage you not to wait for the highway patrol’s final report before speaking with someone who can start preserving evidence now. Reach out to the Charleston truck accident attorneys at Mickelsen Dalton LLC, and let us help you sort out what actually happened.

Sources:

live5news.com/2026/09/12/three-killed-i-95-crash-dorchester-county/

ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-III/subchapter-B/part-395/section-395.3

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn